Nordberg, Donald (2012) Rules of the game: whose value is served when the board fires the owners? Business Ethics: a European review, 21 (3). pp. 298-309. ISSN 0962-8770
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2012.01653.x
How does a board of directors decide what is right? The contest over this question is frequently framed as a debate between shareholder value and stakeholder rights, between a utilitarian view of the ethics of corporate governance and a deontological one. This paper uses a case study with special circumstances that allows us to examine in an unusually clear way the conflict between shareholder value and other bases on which a board can act. In the autumn of 2010, the board of Liverpool Football Club sold the company to another investing group against the explicit wishes of the owners. The peculiar circumstances of this case provide insight into the conflict between ethical approaches to board decisions, allowing us to see certain issues more clearly than we can in listed corporations with many shareholders. What the analysis suggests is that the board saw more than one type of utility on which to base its ethical decision, and that one version resonated with perceived duties to stakeholders. This alignment of outcomes of strategic value with duties contrasted with the utility of shareholder value. While there are reasons to be cautious in generalizing, the case further suggests reasons why boards may reject shareholder value, in opposition to mainstream notions of corporate governance, without rejecting utility as a base of their decisions. Further, the partial alignment of duty and utility facilitates a pragmatic decision rather than one based on a priori claims.
|Research Community:||University of Westminster > Westminster Business School|
|Deposited On:||28 May 2012 14:47|
|Last Modified:||19 Jun 2012 09:35|
Repository Staff Only: item control page