Buchanan, Tom, Ali, Tarick, Heffernan, Thomas M., Ling, Jonathan, Parrott, Andrew C., Rodgers, Jacqui and Scholey, Andrew B. (2005) Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: the case of the prospective memory questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods, 37 (1). pp. 148-154. ISSN 1554-351XFull text not available from this repository.
There is growing evidence that Internet-mediated psychological tests can have satisfactory psychometric properties and can measure the same constructs as traditional versions. However, equivalence cannot be taken for granted. The prospective memory questionnaire (PMQ; Hannon, Adams, Harrington, Fries-Dias, & Gibson, 1995) was used in an on-line study exploring links between drug use and memory (Rodgers et al., 2003). The PMQ has four factor-analytically derived subscales. In a large (N = 763) sample tested via the Internet, only two factors could be recovered; the other two subscales were essentially meaningless. This demonstration of nonequivalence underlines the importance of on-line test validation. Without examination of its psychometric properties, one cannot be sure that a test administered via the Internet actually measures the intended construct.
|Additional Information:||Online ISSN 1554-3528|
|Subjects:||University of Westminster > Social Sciences and Humanities|
|Depositing User:||Miss Nina Watts|
|Date Deposited:||01 Jun 2006|
|Last Modified:||04 Nov 2009 14:47|
Actions (login required)
|Edit Item (Repository staff only)|