Reviewing the Function of Criminal Appeals in England and Wales

Roberts, S. (2017) Reviewing the Function of Criminal Appeals in England and Wales. Jersey and Guernsey Law Review. ISSN 1366-9354 (In Press)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Stephanie Roberts Jersey submission 3rd June final submission.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (169kB) | Preview

Abstract

Recently, there have been considerations for reform of criminal appeals in both England and Wales and Jersey. The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in England and Wales has been criticised for not fulfilling the role intended for it as it has proved to be deficient in identifying and correcting miscarriages of justice. Three main reasons have been suggested as to why this occurs and they are that the Court has shown too much deference to the jury verdict, undue reverence for the principle of finality, and a lack of resources has led to the fear that too many appellants will appeal and the Court will not be able to cope. This article acknowledges that these areas have caused problems for the Court but it seeks to argue that it was their influence prior to the Court of Criminal Appeal’s creation that has caused the problems because it was due to these factors that it was created as a court of review. Therefore, this article argues that the Court’s function of review (and not its powers) lies at the heart of the problem and this should be considered in any law reform process in England and Wales and Jersey.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Criminal appeals, miscarriages of justice, wrongful convictions, ;
Subjects: University of Westminster > Westminster Law School
SWORD Depositor: repository@westminster.ac.uk
Depositing User: repository@westminster.ac.uk
Date Deposited: 12 Jun 2017 09:53
Last Modified: 03 Sep 2017 22:02
URI: http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/id/eprint/19178

Actions (login required)

Edit Item (Repository staff only) Edit Item (Repository staff only)