WestminsterResearch

Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: a comparative assessment of different scenarios

Ekins, Paul and Vanner, Robin and Firebrace, James (2006) Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas facilities: a comparative assessment of different scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management, 79 (4). pp. 420-438. ISSN 0301-4797

[img]
Preview
PDF
448Kb

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.023

Abstract

A material and energy flow analysis, with corresponding financial flows, was carried out for different decommissioning scenarios for the different elements of an offshore oil and gas structure. A comparative assessment was made of the non-financial (especially environmental) outcomes of the different scenarios, with the reference scenario being to leave all structures in situ, while other scenarios envisaged leaving them on the seabed or removing them to shore for recycling and disposal. The costs of each scenario, when compared with the reference scenario, give an implicit valuation of the non-financial outcomes (e.g. environmental improvements), should that scenario be adopted by society. The paper concludes that it is not clear that the removal of the topsides and jackets of large steel structures to shore, as currently required by regulations, is environmentally justified; that concrete structures should certainly be left in place; and that leaving footings, cuttings and pipelines in place, with subsequent monitoring, would also be justified unless very large values were placed by society on a clear seabed and trawling access.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Online ISSN 1095-8630
Uncontrolled Keywords:Offshore oil and gas industry, Decommissioning options, Comparative assessment
Research Community:University of Westminster > Policy Studies Institute (PSI)
ID Code:2030
Deposited On:14 Jun 2006
Last Modified:11 Oct 2011 16:47

Repository Staff Only: item control page