WestminsterResearch will not be accepting deposits until 16th March 2015. This is to allow for a system upgrade and server migration.

Courting controversy: international law, national norms and American nuclear use

Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Helene (2001) Courting controversy: international law, national norms and American nuclear use. Review of International Studies, 27 (3). pp. 309-326. ISSN 0260-2105

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210501003096


In July 1996, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a controversial Advisory Opinion on the legality of nuclear use (including, threat of use). The ICJ found that ‘nuclear use would generally be contrary to the rules of international law’, but it failed to conclude that nuclear use would be unlawful in all circumstances. The major reason for this was because it recognized nuclear norms (that is, the practice of deterrence) to which many states adhered. Taking the American case, this article examines norms of nuclear non-use and nuclear targeting. It shows where these national norms came from, and how they came to be empowered in US policy and embodied in American practice. It is critical of the ICJ's conclusion because, while the norm of non-use is consistent with international law, it finds American targeting norms to be contrary to humanitarian law.

Item Type:Article
Research Community:University of Westminster > Law, School of
ID Code:4609
Deposited On:10 Jan 2008
Last Modified:21 Oct 2009 12:32

Repository Staff Only: item control page