Banakar, Reza (2009) Power, culture and method in comparative law: a review essay of Comparative Law: a Handbook, Esin Orucu & David Nelken, eds., Hart Publishing, 2007. International Journal of Law in Context, 5 (1). pp. 69-85. ISSN 1744-5523
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744552309005047
This review essay draws on a recently edited handbook by Esin Orucu and David Nelken to reflect on the methodological concerns and challenges of comparative law and socio-legal research. It argues that the contextualisation of laws should be regarded as the indispensable methodological characteristic of all comparative studies of law that aspire to transcend the understanding of law as a body of rules and doctrine. It further argues that although the cultural perspective facilitates contextualisation of the law, a cultural understanding is neither a precondition for undertaking comparative legal research nor necessarily the correct approach under all circumstances; for certain aspects of law and legal behaviour need not be conceptualised in cultural terms. The essay concludes by proposing that the combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches could provide a meta-methodological framework within which specific comparative techniques can be employed. Such a framework will enable comparatists and socio-legal researchers to account for how law interacts with, and simultaneously manifests itself at, the macro, micro and the intermediary meso levels of society over time.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Contextualisation, comparative law, socio-legal research, power, legal culture, pluralism, legal traditions, methodology, harmonisation, unification, interdiscipliniarity|
|Research Community:||University of Westminster > Law, School of|
|Deposited On:||21 Apr 2009 14:25|
|Last Modified:||14 Aug 2009 09:41|
Repository Staff Only: item control page