Nordberg, Donald (2007) Fairness in assessing group projects: a conceptual framework for higher education. International Journal of Quality and Standards, 1 (2). p. 15. ISSN 1753-9439Full text not available from this repository.
Group projects form a large and possibly growing component of the work undertaken for assessing students in higher education, and especially in post-graduate work in business. Yet the assessments sources, methods and purposes result in an array of combinations that the literature fails to capture in its full complexity. Tutors may be able to assess the work of the group as well as they might the work of any individual. But grades - and degrees - are awarded to individuals. Writers on higher education speak of using self- and peer-assessment as a way of qualifying the evaluation of group work so as to differentiate between individuals. But these commonly used terms - drawn from approaches to assessing individual work - are ambiguous or even misleading in the context of group work. This paper proposes a framework for discussing the assessment of group projects in an effort to help identify how the benefits of group learning and be translated into fairer summative assessments.
|Subjects:||University of Westminster > Westminster Business School|
|Depositing User:||Miss Nina Watts|
|Date Deposited:||02 Mar 2010 16:37|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2010 16:37|
Actions (login required)
|Edit Item (Repository staff only)|