Pons-Sanz, Sara M. (2006) OE f?s(i)an / ME f?sen revisited. Neophilologus, 90 (1). pp. 119-134. ISSN 0028-2677Full text not available from this repository.
This paper reviews the evidence behind the three main etymological explanations suggested for OE f?s(i)an/ ME f?sen (viz. PGmc *fausjan, PGmc *funsjan and ON *feysa). It argues that none of them can straightforwardly account for the recorded Old and Middle English forms, and that evidence, as it stands, cannot be used to support the increasingly numerous attempts to derive this term from Old Norse despite the apparent late attestation of this verb in Old English and its almost absolute restriction during this period to the Wulfstanian canon, which is renowned for containing a large amount of Norse-derived terms.
|Subjects:||University of Westminster > Social Sciences and Humanities|
|Depositing User:||Miss Nina Watts|
|Date Deposited:||06 May 2010 11:57|
|Last Modified:||06 May 2010 11:57|
Actions (login required)
|Edit Item (Repository staff only)|