Pons-Sanz, Sara M. (2006) OE fēs(i)an / ME fēsen revisited. Neophilologus, 90 (1). pp. 119-134. ISSN 0028-2677
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11061-004-5362-8
This paper reviews the evidence behind the three main etymological explanations suggested for OE fēs(i)an/ ME fēsen (viz. PGmc *fausjan, PGmc *funsjan and ON *feysa). It argues that none of them can straightforwardly account for the recorded Old and Middle English forms, and that evidence, as it stands, cannot be used to support the increasingly numerous attempts to derive this term from Old Norse despite the apparent late attestation of this verb in Old English and its almost absolute restriction during this period to the Wulfstanian canon, which is renowned for containing a large amount of Norse-derived terms.
|Research Community:||University of Westminster > Social Sciences, Humanities and Languages, School of|
|Deposited On:||06 May 2010 12:57|
|Last Modified:||06 May 2010 12:57|
Repository Staff Only: item control page